Hello, ISTE Digital Equity Network!Please see below the following blog post by Matthew Hiefield, originally published at http://digitaldivideinuseducation.blogspot.com/2017/07/school-scaffolding-and-digital-divide.html on July 23, 2017.
School Scaffolding and the Digital Divide
As it turns out, buying devices for students is the easy part. Educators enjoy spreading the news that their school is providing access to students and teaching digital skills that will be critical to their futures. Delivering the devices, opening them up, and watching pleased faces is a feel good moment for most people in a district (granted, the people who are imaging and managing the machines might take issue, but I suspect that device rollout days are exciting as well as exhausting).
Districts, after hearing horror stories from around the world, are more aware of network wifi loads and speed issues, and many are able to avoid the challenges that faced early adopters. And although 75% of districts do not have a plan for internet access outside of the school, at least the issue is starting to percolate through the diligent work of many educators throughout the United States.
Actually, one of the greatest ongoing challenges tends to be the assumption that some districts have about digital learning. In an MIT Study
on education and social media, researchers examined districts that assumed student digital prowess and those that didn't. As one might expect, districts that implemented a 1 to 1 program without significant professional development found that devices were improperly and under used and had a higher breakage rate. Districts that took the more costly and longer route of training their educators on how to implement laptops found a much higher success rate. This "longer implementation" framework often includes school wide awareness programs and proper use and a common set of expectations. Additionally, the professional development pushed teams of teachers to think more about redefining and broadening education through digital implementation instead of just substituting paper worksheets with electronic ones. Proficiency in teaching with technology does not come overnight. At best, it takes several years to master the art of tech integration and informal training "on the go" is minimally effective.
In sum, as districts move forward there is often a sequential implementation of
1. Buying Devices
2. Focusing on the Network
3. Thinking about home access
4. Considering Professional Development with respect to digital instruction.
Although this flow seems to make sense, successful districts more often than not consider professional development and instruction first and not last. Putting training first, although it delays the big rollout, can pay much bigger dividends down the road.